{"id":7007,"date":"2026-07-11T10:05:34","date_gmt":"2026-07-11T10:05:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007"},"modified":"2026-07-11T10:05:34","modified_gmt":"2026-07-11T10:05:34","slug":"conflicting-court-orders-over-citizenship-data-stir-more-midterm-confusion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007","title":{"rendered":"Conflicting court orders over citizenship data stir more midterm confusion"},"content":{"rendered":"

One judge blocked states from using a government database to confirm voters are citizens. Another said some states must have access to it.<\/strong><\/p>

Read more Here are the races to watch as Democrats grow more bullish on retaking the Senate<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n
Voting booths at a polling place in Newtown, Pennsylvania, in 2024. (Matt Rourke\/AP)<\/figcaption>\n<\/figure>\n

Two federal judges, presiding nearly 1,000 miles apart, issued conflicting rulings in recent days that left unclear whether states can legally abide by a Trump administration push to use federal data to confirm all voters are citizens.<\/p>\n

The competing court decisions come as pivotal midterm elections are months away and as President Donald Trump has been working to reshape voting procedures.<\/p>\n

Trump has claimed that large numbers of noncitizens cast ballots, despite evidence showing that is not the case. <\/b>Some Republican-led states have sought to verify that everyone on their voter rolls is a citizen by gaining unfettered access to a federal database that is typically used by government officials to determine eligibility for benefits programs. Democrats and voting rights advocates have called the approach unacceptable, citing instances in which inaccurate data has led to eligible voters being kicked off the rolls.<\/p>\n

The disagreement among judges adds a new layer of confusion for state and local election officials who are barreling toward November\u2019s elections while contending with shifting policies<\/a>, sweeping federal demands<\/a> and persistent conspiracy theories<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Trump, who has for years falsely claimed he won the 2020 election, this week dismantled a bipartisan commission<\/a> meant to help keep elections secure. He also refused<\/a> to sign a bipartisan housing bill to protest lawmakers\u2019 failure to pass legislation that would require people to provide proof of citizenship when they register to vote and show ID when they cast ballots. And his administration warned election officials that they could be charged with crimes if they knowingly allow noncitizens to vote.<\/p>\n

The recent decisions from a pair of judges \u2014 one appointed by Trump, one by President Joe Biden \u2014 injected more uncertainty into this fall\u2019s elections. They centered on state access to an enhanced version of a federal database stocked with citizenship information.<\/p>\n

The Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements database is used by government agencies nationwide to help determine eligibility for health care benefits, ID cards and professional licenses, among other things. It is run through the Department of Homeland Security, and the administration recently expanded how states could use the database to more fully and easily check their voter rolls.<\/p>\n

Last month, U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan in D.C. ruled<\/a> that the use of the database violated privacy laws, noting it had been used to revoke eligible voters\u2019 registrations. In response, DHS limited state election officials\u2019 access to the database.<\/p>\n

Soon afterward, though, four Republican-led states turned to U.S. District Judge T. Kent Wetherell II in northern Florida. Wetherell last year signed off on a settlement between those states and DHS that gave them expanded access to the database, and they argued that the department had now violated the terms of that agreement.<\/p>\n

Wetherell on Tuesday agreed with them, concluding<\/a> that the department had to make the enhanced database available to the four states. His decision conflicted with Sooknanan\u2019s opinion, but he said he was discounting her ruling because he was not bound by it and disagreed with its conclusions.<\/p>\n

Sooknanan was appointed to the bench by Biden, while Wetherell was tapped by Trump during his first term.<\/p>\n

On Wednesday, Sooknanan stood by her previous ruling, writing in a new opinion<\/a> that Wetherell had \u201cerred in significant ways.\u201d<\/p>\n

The divide between the courts left DHS officials with two sets of orders pointing in opposite directions, at least for the states covered by the settlement \u2014 Florida, Indiana, Iowa and Ohio.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhere that leaves us, we\u2019re not sure,\u201d said David Becker, the executive director of the nonprofit Center for Election Innovation and Research, which assists election officials.<\/p>\n

The legal thicket could soon get thornier. One appeal is underway and another could be filed soon. But those appeals would go to courts in separate circuits, and more contradictory opinions are possible. If appeals courts don\u2019t resolve the issue, it could wind up before the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

The Justice Department and DHS did not respond to requests for comment about the split decisions and how the Trump administration would respond, including which one they would follow. Officials from the four states did not say whether they had been granted full access to the database.<\/p>\n

In a court filing Friday in D.C., Justice Department officials said the Trump administration was \u201cnow in the process of restoring some of the previously vacated SAVE functionality\u201d for the four states involved in the Florida settlement. They wrote in a status report<\/a> that the administration sought \u201cto comply with all outstanding court-ordered obligations to the greatest extent possible.\u201d<\/p>\n

But the groups that had sued to challenge the expanded use of the database wrote that the administration was acting unlawfully and violating the D.C. judge\u2019s order by restoring any access.<\/p>

Read more Jordan achieves a try-scoring record as New Zealand beats Italy 47-17 in the Nations Championship<\/a><\/p>\n

The competing rulings have added to volatile disputes over how elections should run, with policies fluctuating ahead of elections that will decide which party controls Congress.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe like to have stable rules in advance of the election for voters and for election administrators, so anything that disrupts that stability is problematic,\u201d said Derek Muller, an election-law professor at the University of Notre Dame.<\/p>\n

The issue may have to be resolved quickly. Federal law bars states from making systemic changes to their voter rolls 90 days before elections.<\/p>\n

Fights over election rules have greatly escalated in the Trump era. The president this week removed members of the Election Assistance Commission, and the administration recently threatened to cut aid to states that don\u2019t change their election policies. The Justice Department has sued 30 states for their voter rolls, but it has lost every case that has been decided so far.<\/p>\n

\u201cStates are custodians of a huge amount of voter data,\u201d said Rebecca Green, law professor at William & Mary and co-director of the Election Law Program. The federal government\u2019s intense push for this data \u201cis a new phenomenon,\u201d Green said, and threatens state and federal privacy laws.<\/p>\n

Despite the Trump administration\u2019s persistent focus on voting by noncitizens, this rarely happens<\/a>, according to court reviews and independent studies. But noncitizens do sometimes wind up on voter rolls, and Trump and his allies have made scrubbing the rolls a top priority.<\/p>\n

To help states, the administration expanded the functionality of the database so they could check their voter rolls in bulk instead of one by one. It also allowed them to check voters using partial Social Security numbers and access data showing whether someone was a citizen when they were given a Social Security number. That information often is not updated if someone later becomes a citizen.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is an attack on people\u2019s right to vote,\u201d said Donald Sherman, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which brought the lawsuit in D.C. over the database.<\/p>\n

Election officials in Republican-led states have said full access to the database is essential. Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd called the database \u201can important tool in maintaining accurate voter rolls,\u201d and Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose said it helped make his state the \u201cnational gold standard\u201d for election integrity.<\/p>\n

But the misidentifications prompted Sooknanan in June to halt use of an expanded database that, she wrote, administration officials \u201cknew to be unreliable.\u201d<\/p>\n

She cited privacy concerns, writing that \u201cCongress put protections in place to prevent precisely this type of centralized data bank.\u201d<\/p>\n

In response, four of the states asked Wetherell to restore their full access to the database. He quickly sided with them, acknowledging in a 10-page order<\/a> that the administration was \u201cin a bind\u201d because it was \u201csubject to two contradictory orders.\u201d<\/p>\n

Wetherell wrote that this \u201cconundrum\u201d may have been avoided if the parties involved had alerted the judges sooner about the status of the other case dealing with the database. Still, Wetherell wrote, \u201cone of the orders has to give,\u201d and he concluded it should not be his.<\/p>\n

The next day, Sooknanan stood by her decision. She wrote in a 23-page opinion<\/a> that the four states entered their settlement with the administration soon after the lawsuit before her was initiated, knowing that the same issues were in play and that they risked creating \u201cself-inflicted\u201d problems.<\/p>\n

Sooknanan also cast a critical eye on Wetherell\u2019s order, writing that her 75-page June opinion<\/a> resulted from \u201cthorough, adverse briefing on the merits,\u201d while her peer in Florida \u201cspent roughly one paragraph to reach differing conclusions.\u201d<\/p>\n

In her latest ruling, she declined to stay her June ruling, pending appeal.<\/p>\n

Harmeet K. Dhillon, the assistant attorney general who leads the Civil Rights Division at the Justice Department, on Tuesday sent letters to top state election officials warning them they could be charged with crimes if they knowingly allowed noncitizens to vote this fall.<\/p>\n

State officials were quick to say they follow all election laws, and many Democrats viewed the letters as an attempt to intimidate them. \u201cThe U.S. DOJ is knocking on our door again with more threats and no evidence to back up their fever dreams about non-existent voter fraud,\u201d Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read said in a statement.<\/p>

Read more Nationals falter in the ninth, enabling comeback win for the Yankees<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Judges in recent days issued contradictory opinions on the use of a database that can check the citizenship status of voters. The competing orders are leading to uncertainty.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7001,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7007","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-interesting"],"yoast_head":"\nConflicting court orders over citizenship data stir more midterm confusion - Moving Insider USA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Conflicting court orders over citizenship data stir more midterm confusion - Moving Insider USA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Judges in recent days issued contradictory opinions on the use of a database that can check the citizenship status of voters. The competing orders are leading to uncertainty.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Moving Insider USA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-11T10:05:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/8a8f1e86601d948d3327e2ebd61242d1-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1707\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/22d40ab81790f6a361021763bb56ef03\"},\"headline\":\"Conflicting court orders over citizenship data stir more midterm confusion\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-11T10:05:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7007\"},\"wordCount\":1597,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7007#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/ba5049952a924034a08c30733a9c3269-scaled.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Interesting\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7007\",\"name\":\"Conflicting court orders over citizenship data stir more midterm confusion - Moving Insider USA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7007#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7007#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/ba5049952a924034a08c30733a9c3269-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-11T10:05:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/22d40ab81790f6a361021763bb56ef03\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7007#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/ba5049952a924034a08c30733a9c3269-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/ba5049952a924034a08c30733a9c3269-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1707},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Conflicting court orders over citizenship data stir more midterm confusion\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Moving Insider USA\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/22d40ab81790f6a361021763bb56ef03\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Conflicting court orders over citizenship data stir more midterm confusion - Moving Insider USA","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Conflicting court orders over citizenship data stir more midterm confusion - Moving Insider USA","og_description":"Judges in recent days issued contradictory opinions on the use of a database that can check the citizenship status of voters. The competing orders are leading to uncertainty.","og_url":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007","og_site_name":"Moving Insider USA","article_published_time":"2026-07-11T10:05:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1707,"url":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/8a8f1e86601d948d3327e2ebd61242d1-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/#\/schema\/person\/22d40ab81790f6a361021763bb56ef03"},"headline":"Conflicting court orders over citizenship data stir more midterm confusion","datePublished":"2026-07-11T10:05:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007"},"wordCount":1597,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/ba5049952a924034a08c30733a9c3269-scaled.jpg","articleSection":["Interesting"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007","url":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007","name":"Conflicting court orders over citizenship data stir more midterm confusion - Moving Insider USA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/ba5049952a924034a08c30733a9c3269-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-11T10:05:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/#\/schema\/person\/22d40ab81790f6a361021763bb56ef03"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/ba5049952a924034a08c30733a9c3269-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/ba5049952a924034a08c30733a9c3269-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":1707},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Conflicting court orders over citizenship data stir more midterm confusion"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/","name":"Moving Insider USA","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/#\/schema\/person\/22d40ab81790f6a361021763bb56ef03","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com"],"url":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7007"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7007\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7001"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}