{"id":7897,"date":"2026-07-20T22:09:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-20T22:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897"},"modified":"2026-07-20T22:09:00","modified_gmt":"2026-07-20T22:09:00","slug":"trump-officials-seek-to-weaken-historic-preservation-reviews-of-projects","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897","title":{"rendered":"Trump officials seek to weaken historic-preservation reviews of projects"},"content":{"rendered":"

The reviews under the law, known as Section 106, have bound up the president\u2019s planned arch.<\/strong><\/p>

Read more Democrat set to replace Platner in Maine led state Senate with a temper<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n
President Donald Trump speaks to reporters about construction at the former site of the East Wing on May 19. (Samuel Corum\/Pool\/FTWP)<\/figcaption>\n<\/figure>\n

The Trump administration is seeking to loosen <\/b>federal rules intended to protect historic sites, alarming outside groups who say the changes would allow government agencies and developers to pursue major projects \u2014 such as President Donald Trump\u2019s planned triumphal arch \u2014 without soliciting <\/b>public input.<\/p>\n

The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, a low-profile federal agency that oversees preservation reviews and advises the president and Congress, on Friday proposed significant revisions to a federally required process<\/a> that governs changes to landmarks such as the National Mall, sites that are significant to Indian tribes and other properties eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places<\/a>. The process currently applies to any construction projects that are on federal land or receive federal funding, as well as private projects that require any type of federal approval.<\/p>\n

Under the current rules, federal agencies must undertake a multistep Section 106 review assessing the potential effects of construction projects and soliciting public input, among other requirements. The revised rules would let federal agencies build their own projects or grant approval for construction by private developers without public input, according to a proposed rule<\/a> and an accompanying document<\/a> obtained by The Washington Post.<\/p>\n

Trump officials have previously said the 60-year-old rules can hamper development projects and needed renovations and had called for the regulations to be overhauled. But the timing of the administration\u2019s announcement and the breadth of the proposed changes caught many historic preservation groups off guard.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat is going to happen regularly is communities are not going to know that major projects are happening in their backyard until the bulldozers show up,\u201d said Marion F. Werkheiser, a founding attorney at Cultural Heritage Partners, who has reviewed the proposed changes. Werkheiser\u2019s firm is involved in litigation against the Trump administration over plans to alter the Eisenhower Executive Office Building and the Kennedy Center.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n
Scaffolding and tarp cover the building name at the Kennedy Center on June 30. (Al Drago\/For The Washington Post)<\/figcaption>\n<\/figure>\n

Sara Bronin, who led the ACHP under the Biden administration, called the proposed rules a \u201csloppy, ill-conceived draft\u201d and predicted they would be challenged in court.<\/p>\n

Travis Voyles, a Trump appointee who serves as the council\u2019s vice chairman, asked council members to vote on the proposed changes to Section 106 by this coming Friday, according to an email obtained by The Post. If council members support the new regulations, they could advance to the White House for the next step in the formal rulemaking process, Voyles wrote.<\/p>\n

ACHP did not immediately respond to questions about the planned changes and whether the White House had directed them. The White House declined to comment. The Atlantic previously reported<\/a> the proposed changes.<\/p>\n

Experts said the rules govern changes to 1.4 million properties across the country, ranging from several thousand national landmarks to local historic districts and sites in many communities<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Several Trump administration projects, such as the president\u2019s planned triumphal arch near Arlington National Cemetery, have been bound up in the ACHP\u2019s historic-preservation reviews. Outside groups have said that the rules are essential to protecting key sites and public spaces and warned that the planned changes would undercut decades of precedent.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n
A scaled-down model of an arch proposed by President Donald Trump at the Great American State Fair along the National Mall on July 3. (Matt McClain\/FTWP)<\/figcaption>\n<\/figure>\n

\u201cThis is not only a massive assault on laws that have benefited that nation for some 60 years, it almost completely eliminates the role of the public,\u201d Charles A. Birnbaum, the CEO of the Cultural Landscape Foundation, an education and advocacy organization, said in a statement. \u201cThe proposal actually eliminates language that says: \u2018The views of the public are essential to informed Federal decisionmaking in the section 106 process.\u2019 How unAmerican is that?\u201d<\/p>\n

The proposal narrows what is considered a \u201chistoric property\u201d that can be protected, tightens the scope on what is considered an \u201cundertaking\u201d affecting that property under the law, and makes the process of consulting states and the public optional. What qualifies as a historic property is now limited to places that are \u201cgeographically compact\u201d and have been improved by humans at some point.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor the avoidance of doubt, noncompact, unimproved natural features such as mountains, valleys, bodies of water, or landscapes, including ethnographic landscapes, do not qualify as property,\u201d according to the proposal.<\/p>

Read more Supreme Court to decide if man will lose his plane over illicit beer<\/a><\/p>\n

Outside groups said they had little chance of stopping this week\u2019s vote. Twenty of the 24 seats on the ACHP are either directly appointed by the president or are reserved for the heads of federal agencies, such as the Interior Department, which are controlled by Trump.<\/p>\n

The Trump administration has separately remade other federal panels, such as the Commission of Fine Arts and the National Capital Planning Commission. Those panels have swiftly advanced some of Trump\u2019s pet projects, such as his planned White House ballroom.<\/p>\n

Several Trump officials at an AHCP meeting last month shared<\/a> their frustration about the existing Section 106 rules and said they supported reforms.<\/p>\n

Michael Boren, an Agriculture Department official who oversees the Forest Service, said that some efforts to replace unsafe, decades-old infrastructure at ski areas that are on national land had been stymied by the regulations.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen they\u2019re over 50 years old, they\u2019re historic structures and when we\u2019re trying to replace them, we sometimes are delayed for years just by the historic piece,\u201d Boren said.<\/p>\n

Werkheiser said the change would exclude landscapes that tribes hold sacred that would have been previously considered under the existing rules, potentially opening them up to development and destruction by industry. That could also remove the law\u2019s protections against projects such as one that would build power lines near Thomas Jefferson\u2019s Monticello estate and spoil the view from the historic site, she said.<\/p>\n

Bronin said that provision would allow the Trump administration to expedite some controversial projects, such as a planned copper mine in Arizona located on a sacred Apache site known as Oak Flat<\/a>. Democrats and historic preservationists have said<\/a> that the planned mine will destroy the site.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn the urban context, taken to the extreme, this phrase may be used to limit protected properties to just a building or a handful of buildings \u2014 making larger historic districts, like the French Quarter in New Orleans or historic Savannah vulnerable to needless destruction,\u201d Bronin wrote in a message.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n
Construction workers place a tarp over the scaffolding that surrounds the columns at the North Portico of the White House on July 9. (Anna Moneymaker\/Getty Images)<\/figcaption>\n<\/figure>\n

The proposal would also give federal agencies a new way to approve projects without reaching agreement with states, tribes or other parties involved in the review process. Historically, those decisions were memorialized through a \u201cmemorandum of agreement\u201d negotiated with state or tribal authorities and other interested parties.<\/p>\n

The new rules would create an alternative called a \u201cmemorandum of decision,\u201d allowing an agency to move forward on its own, without consultation with the states or the public. States and tribes would no longer be able to try to block a project or invoke a dispute-resolution process if they object. Agencies would still have to consult affected tribes but would not have to incorporate their feedback.<\/p>\n

Several experts also noted that the current Section 106 rules have required the Trump administration to take public feedback on some of Trump\u2019s projects. Under the new regulations, the federal government could unilaterally decide that public input is not in the general interest, exclude the public from the process, and issue its decision unilaterally.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe agency is going to decide if it\u2019s in the public interest to inform the public about what they\u2019re getting ready to do in that public\u2019s local community. And that just seems so Orwellian to me,\u201d Werkheiser said.<\/p>

Read more George Santos is heading to reality TV. Other politicians have done the same.<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Trump administration is moving to rewrite federal historic-preservation rules to give agencies broader authority to advance projects with less public input and narrower protections for historic sites.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7891,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-interesting"],"yoast_head":"\nTrump officials seek to weaken historic-preservation reviews of projects - Moving Insider USA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Trump officials seek to weaken historic-preservation reviews of projects - Moving Insider USA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Trump administration is moving to rewrite federal historic-preservation rules to give agencies broader authority to advance projects with less public input and narrower protections for historic sites.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Moving Insider USA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-20T22:09:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/30d82f78c49ffaad113a776c773083c6-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1707\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7897#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7897\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/22d40ab81790f6a361021763bb56ef03\"},\"headline\":\"Trump officials seek to weaken historic-preservation reviews of projects\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-20T22:09:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7897\"},\"wordCount\":1376,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7897#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/513b8ebddcafff9f2c51046bbc6f76dc-scaled.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Interesting\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7897#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7897\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7897\",\"name\":\"Trump officials seek to weaken historic-preservation reviews of projects - Moving Insider USA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7897#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7897#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/513b8ebddcafff9f2c51046bbc6f76dc-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-20T22:09:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/22d40ab81790f6a361021763bb56ef03\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7897#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7897\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7897#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/513b8ebddcafff9f2c51046bbc6f76dc-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/513b8ebddcafff9f2c51046bbc6f76dc-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1707,\"caption\":\"WASHINGTON, D.C. - MAY 19: President Donald Trump speaks to the press about construction at the former site of the East Wing, which will become a new White House ballroom, on May 19, 2026 at the White House in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Samuel Corum\\\/Pool\\\/For The Washington Post)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?p=7897#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Trump officials seek to weaken historic-preservation reviews of projects\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Moving Insider USA\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/22d40ab81790f6a361021763bb56ef03\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/movinginsiderusa.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Trump officials seek to weaken historic-preservation reviews of projects - Moving Insider USA","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Trump officials seek to weaken historic-preservation reviews of projects - Moving Insider USA","og_description":"The Trump administration is moving to rewrite federal historic-preservation rules to give agencies broader authority to advance projects with less public input and narrower protections for historic sites.","og_url":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897","og_site_name":"Moving Insider USA","article_published_time":"2026-07-20T22:09:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1707,"url":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/30d82f78c49ffaad113a776c773083c6-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/#\/schema\/person\/22d40ab81790f6a361021763bb56ef03"},"headline":"Trump officials seek to weaken historic-preservation reviews of projects","datePublished":"2026-07-20T22:09:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897"},"wordCount":1376,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/513b8ebddcafff9f2c51046bbc6f76dc-scaled.jpg","articleSection":["Interesting"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897","url":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897","name":"Trump officials seek to weaken historic-preservation reviews of projects - Moving Insider USA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/513b8ebddcafff9f2c51046bbc6f76dc-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-20T22:09:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/#\/schema\/person\/22d40ab81790f6a361021763bb56ef03"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/513b8ebddcafff9f2c51046bbc6f76dc-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/513b8ebddcafff9f2c51046bbc6f76dc-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":1707,"caption":"WASHINGTON, D.C. - MAY 19: President Donald Trump speaks to the press about construction at the former site of the East Wing, which will become a new White House ballroom, on May 19, 2026 at the White House in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Samuel Corum\/Pool\/For The Washington Post)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?p=7897#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Trump officials seek to weaken historic-preservation reviews of projects"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/","name":"Moving Insider USA","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/#\/schema\/person\/22d40ab81790f6a361021763bb56ef03","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com"],"url":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7897","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7897"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7897\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7891"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movinginsiderusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}