The Supreme Court is upholding state laws barring transgender girls and women from playing on school athletic teams, in another setback for transgender people
The Supreme Court’s decision on Tuesday to loosen campaign finance laws by allowing party committees to coordinate with candidates is a boon for Republicans and threatens to deepen Democratic fundraising woes.
The survey suggests Democrats have a chance to win a statewide contest in Texas for the first time since the 1990s.
The incumbent senator accuses his challenger of being a Democratic plant set up to confuse primary voters, but fellow Republican Dan J. Sullivan has said his desire to run is genuine.
If the court had struck down birthright citizenship and upheld President Donald Trump’s executive order, the ruling would have had sweeping political, economic and social ramifications.
The decision is the latest in which the Supreme Court has weighed in on campaign finance rules.
The ruling is the latest blow to the LGBTQ+ community, which has faced repeated losses at the Supreme Court in recent years.
Rep. Tom Kean (R-New Jersey) has pledged to be “completely transparent” about what happened upon his return.
The stellar ownership group of Major League Soccer team LAFC has sold its majority stake in struggling Swiss club Grasshopper after three straight seasons fighting relegation
The Supreme Court rulings could affect who is considered a citizen, whether there are limits on how much parties can spend in coordination with federal candidates, and whether transgender athletes can participate in sports.