Trump’s latest declaration of an emergency leaves GOP allies scrambling again

The president’s pressure campaign on his elections bill is the latest example of a governing style built around urgency.

Read more Federal court blocks Trump’s executive order limiting mail ballots

President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) head to a meeting of GOP senators Wednesday. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) has scheduled a rush visit to the White House on Thursday afternoon to try to unsnarl the knot created when President Donald Trump abruptly canceled a signing ceremony for a bipartisan affordable housing bill.

Trump said Wednesday that senators should first focus on passing the Save America Act, a voting measure he cast as necessary to confront a national emergency.

For many GOP lawmakers, the episode was the latest example of an increasingly familiar frustration: Trump uses his bully pulpit to upend the plans of congressional Republicans who are trying to advance his agenda while also protecting their own political interests. And he frequently does so under the guise of something he deems an emergency.

“Congress is very focused on the upcoming midterms. Trump is very focused on his legacy,” said Alex Conant, a Republican political strategist. “For Trump, who feels like the 2020 election was stolen and is laying the groundwork for the argument that the 2026 midterms are stolen, he thinks the Save America Act is the most important legislation Congress can pass.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana), right, and acting attorney general Todd Blanche watch a rally on the National Mall on Wednesday. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

A senior White House official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said Trump concluded Wednesday morning that the housing bill gave him leverage to pressure the Senate on the Save America Act. Trump also raised the issue in remarks to Senate Republicans later that day.

How Trump described the issue offered the latest example of his expansive use of emergency framing. Trump has repeatedly described a conveyor belt of political, economic and policy disputes as emergencies, using the language of crisis not only for immediate threats but also for priorities he argues require urgent action.

In his second term, Trump has steadily expanded his emergency framing from traditional areas of presidential crisis management into ordinary policy disputes. Some of Trump’s emergencies come through formal declarations. Others are rhetorical instruments. Both serve the same political function: collapsing the distinction between a policy preference and a national crisis.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Since 2025, Trump has invoked emergencies over the southern border, cartels, fentanyl, energy production, global trade deficits and crime in D.C. He’s also previously said both issues at stake in the current fracas — housing and elections — constituted national emergencies.

“I think Trump’s rhetoric through the last decade is normalized and this sort of language is part of his rhetorical style,” Conant said.

Speaking from the Oval Office on Wednesday, Trump spoke of election fraud in alarmist terms — repeating unfounded claims about rigged elections that he said were corrosive to American democracy. He refused to budge on the housing bill until there was movement on the Save America Act.

“There’s no compromise,” Trump said. “It’s voter ID. It’s proof of citizenship, and it’s also the mail-in ballots. … We have a lot of rigged elections.”

Trump’s move threatened to undercut Republicans facing midterm headwinds, largely from the economic impact of his own agenda. A year of high and often-changing tariffs has unsettled the global economy and raised prices. Trump’s decision to attack Iran on Feb. 28 destabilized the Strait of Hormuz, a choke point for roughly 20 percent of the world’s oil supply, adding pressure to energy markets.

The housing bill was supposed to offer Republicans a counterpoint: a clear, campaign-ready example of action on affordability at a time when voters remain frustrated by high prices.

The president’s move to stall — and perhaps kill — the bill bewildered some Republicans.

Read more Supreme Court strikes down Hawaii limits on carrying guns in public

“It makes no sense,” Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) told reporters Wednesday. “This bill has very strong bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate. The primary author is a Republican senator. And it addresses an issue that affects many American families who find the cost of housing to be a tremendous burden.”

The bill aims to address the nation’s housing affordability crisis by cutting red tape for home construction, modernizing federal housing programs, expanding financing options and limiting large institutional investors’ ability to buy up single-family homes. It’s a package lawmakers in both parties have described as the most significant federal housing legislation in decades.

Politically, the measure strengthens incumbents’ positions as they return to their districts and have conversations with voters about rising prices, Conant said.

“Affordability is going to be the number one issue in this election. Republicans and Democrats are going to be running ads on what they did on affordability,” Conant said. “This bill was passed because Republicans and Democrats alike want to point to what they’re doing to address housing costs, and if he vetoes it, Democrats are going to run attack ads pointing out that he vetoed it.”

Trump’s action was the second abrupt about-face from the White House in as many weeks.

Last week, Trump reversed course on his nominee to be director of national intelligence, Jay Clayton. The Senate Intelligence Committee was hours away from questioning Clayton when Trump announced on Truth Social that the hearing would be delayed unless senators first confirmed Jamie McDonald, Clayton’s would-be replacement as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York.

The move left Senate Republicans caught between accommodating Trump’s last-minute demand and defending a confirmation process they had already set in motion. Trump also threatened to withhold reauthorization of a surveillance tool that national security officials say is a critical anti-terrorism measure unless the Senate passed the Save America Act.

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana) leaves GOP senators’ closed-door meeting with Trump on Wednesday. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

As it stands, Trump’s agenda remains stalled on Capitol Hill four months ahead of the midterm elections, when Republicans could lose control of one or both chambers.

Democrats have refused to reauthorize the surveillance law, which expired this month, as long as Bill Pulte remains acting director of national intelligence. Pulte has no national security experience, and Democrats say he has abused his role as director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency by accusing several long-standing Trump opponents of mortgage fraud.

Trump also asked Congress on Wednesday for $88 billion in additional money for the Pentagon to help pay for the Iran war. That bill needs the support of at least seven Democrats to pass the Senate — and Democrats oppose it.

Sen. Chris Coons (Delaware), the top Democrat on the Appropriations defense subcommittee, said Trump had not justified the war in Iran and faulted the bill for not including aid for Ukraine. He also criticized the Pentagon for pursuing “vanity projects” and not developing clear plans to spend the money it already has.

“This bill accomplishes few of those goals, and if brought to the floor, my Democratic colleagues and I would oppose it,” he said in a statement.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) said the Senate will try to make progress on its unfinished business when senators return from their two-week recess July 13. The chamber could also take up a farm bill, a cryptocurrency bill and legislation to regulate college sports, he said.

“There’s a number of things, but it’s all going to be a function of what can we get 60 [votes] for,” Thune told reporters Wednesday night. “And we’ll make a lot of those decisions over the next couple of weeks.”

Read more Rubio’s new job? Selling Trump’s Iran deal to a worried Gulf.

Isaac Arnsdorf contributed to this report.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *